.png)
.png)
Not ready for a demo?
Join us for a live product tour - available every Thursday at 8am PT/11 am ET
Schedule a demo
.svg)
No, I will lose this chance & potential revenue
x
x
X
X
X
Let me paint you a picture. It's Friday afternoon, your team just deployed a seemingly innocent Terraform update, and suddenly your AWS bill looks like a phone number. Worse, your security team is blowing up Slack because someone accidentally made your production database publicly accessible. Again.
If you've been in cloud operations for more than five minutes, you know this scenario. Infrastructure as Code promised us repeatability and reliability, but what we often get is repeatable mistakes at unprecedented scale.
IBM's report shows that 69% of cloud breaches stem from misconfigurations. That number should terrify you, because it means we're failing at the basics.
The solution everyone's talking about is "shifting left" on IaC security. But like most buzzwords that make it into vendor slide decks, the actual implementation details get lost somewhere between the marketing promise and Monday morning reality.
So let's talk about what this actually means and how to do it without making your developers want to quit.
Here's how security typically works in most organizations: Development teams build features for weeks, infrastructure gets coded, everything passes functional tests, and then someone remembers to run it by security. This usually happens around Thursday afternoon, with deployment scheduled for Friday evening (because we love living dangerously).
Security finds seventeen critical issues. Development argues that twelve of them are false positives. The remaining five require architectural changes that will take two weeks to implement. The business stakeholders, who've been promising this feature to customers, start sending emails with lots of capital letters.
Sound familiar? This pattern repeats because we treat security as quality control rather than quality assurance.
Walk into any reasonably sized engineering organization and ask what IaC tools they use. The answer will be "Yes." Terraform for AWS, ARM templates for Azure (because someone insisted), CloudFormation for that one legacy service nobody wants to migrate, Pulumi for the team that likes actual programming languages, and raw Kubernetes manifests for everything else.
Each tool has its own syntax, its own quirks, and its own creative ways to expose your data to the internet. Your security team, meanwhile, consists of three people who learned AWS in 2019 and one contractor who swears Kubernetes security "isn't that complicated" (spoiler alert: it is).
Trying to maintain consistent security across this zoo of technologies is like herding cats while juggling flaming torches. Blindfolded.
Every organization has that one person who lives and breathes compliance frameworks. They can recite NIST controls in their sleep and get genuinely excited about SOC 2 Type II attestations. God bless them, because without these people, we'd all be getting sued.
The problem is that compliance frameworks were written for a world where infrastructure changes happened quarterly, not every five minutes.
Mapping "ensure appropriate access controls" to a dynamically scaling Kubernetes cluster with service mesh sidecars and GitOps deployments is an exercise in creative interpretation.
Most teams handle this by running compliance checks right before audits, discovering hundreds of violations, and then spending the next three weeks in "remediation sprint" mode. This is about as effective as cramming for finals: you might pass, but you'll forget everything immediately after.
Policy as Code sounds great until you realize someone has to write and maintain those policies. Open Policy Agent is powerful, but Rego looks like someone fed regular expressions to an alien and asked it to design a programming language.
Here's what actually works: Start simple. Pick five security policies that would prevent your most common incidents:
Write these in whatever policy language your tools support, but more importantly, write documentation that explains WHY each policy exists. Include examples of incidents these policies would have prevented. Engineers are more likely to follow rules when they understand the reasoning.
The best time to tell a developer about a security issue is while they're writing the code, not three weeks later in a code review. Here's the progression that actually works:
Level 1: IDE Integration Get security scanning into your developers' editors. Tools like the Checkov VS Code extension or tfsec plugins provide immediate feedback. When a developer types ingress_from_port = 22 and immediately sees a warning, they'll fix it before it ever hits git.
Level 2: Pre-commit Hooks Some developers disable IDE plugins (looking at you, vim users). Pre-commit hooks catch issues before they enter version control. Use tools like pre-commit framework with Checkov or tfsec. Keep the checks fast, or developers will bypass them with --no-verify.
Level 3: Pull Request Automation This is your safety net. Every PR should trigger security scans that post results as comments. Make the output actionable: don't just say "security group violation," explain what needs to change and why.
Level 4: Pipeline Enforcement Your CI/CD pipeline is the final gate. But here's the key: if issues are getting caught here regularly, your earlier stages have failed. Pipeline security checks should be boring because everything already passed the previous filters.
Every organization tries to create "blessed" infrastructure modules. Most fail because the modules are either too restrictive ("why can't I set this parameter?") or too complex ("this module has 847 configuration options").
Here's what works:
Create modules for specific use cases, not generic resources. Instead of a "generic S3 bucket module," create:
Each module should be opinionated about security but flexible about business logic. Hardcode the security group rules, make the instance size configurable.
Document each module with three things:
If developers have to read source code to understand your module, you've already lost.
Hardcoded secrets in IaC are like cockroaches: for every one you see, there are dozens hiding. The solution isn't just tooling, it's making the right way easier than the wrong way.
First, scan for secrets everywhere:
But scanning is reactive. The proactive approach:
Instead of treating compliance as a quarterly fire drill, build it into your daily workflow. But here's the trick: don't tell developers they're doing compliance.
Map your security policies to compliance frameworks behind the scenes. When a developer fixes an "overly permissive security group," they're actually addressing CIS AWS Foundations
Benchmark 4.1, NIST AC-3, and PCI DSS 1.3.1. But they don't need to know that.
Use tools like Terraform Compliance or Cloud Custodian to continuously validate your infrastructure against compliance requirements. Generate reports automatically. When audit time comes, you're not scrambling for evidence; you're clicking "export PDF."
Pro tip: Auditors love dashboards. Build a simple compliance dashboard that shows green checkmarks. It doesn't need to be fancy, just accurate and updated. You'd be amazed how much easier audits become when you can show continuous compliance rather than point-in-time checks.
Forget vanity metrics like "number of security scans run." Track things that indicate actual improvement:
Numbers tell part of the story, but culture tells the rest. You know you're succeeding when:
Let's face some facts that vendors won't tell you:
The future of IaC security isn't about more scanning or stricter policies. It's about making security invisible. We're heading toward a world where:
But that's tomorrow. Today, you need to start somewhere. Pick one thing from this guide, implement it next week, and build from there.
Shifting left on IaC security is fundamentally about changing when and how we think about security. Instead of a gate at the end of the process, it becomes guardrails throughout the journey.
The organizations succeeding at this aren't the ones with the biggest security budgets or the most sophisticated tools. They're the ones that made security everyone's job without making it everyone's burden.
Start small, be consistent, measure everything, and remember: the goal isn't to stop all mistakes (impossible), it's to catch them before they cost you a fortune or a headline.
.png)
.png)
Koushik M.
"Exceptional Hands-On Security Learning Platform"
Varunsainadh K.
"Practical Security Training with Real-World Labs"
Gaël Z.
"A new generation platform showing both attacks and remediations"
Nanak S.
"Best resource to learn for appsec and product security"
.svg)
.svg)
Koushik M.
"Exceptional Hands-On Security Learning Platform"
Varunsainadh K.
"Practical Security Training with Real-World Labs"
Gaël Z.
"A new generation platform showing both attacks and remediations"
Nanak S.
"Best resource to learn for appsec and product security"
.svg)
United States11166 Fairfax Boulevard, 500, Fairfax, VA 22030
APAC
68 Circular Road, #02-01, 049422, Singapore
For Support write to help@appsecengineer.com
