Modern AI is not one product. It is a daisy chain of artifacts you do not fully control. Attackers know this. Finance knows this when the bill spikes at 3 a.m. Compliance knows this when Private AI syncs logs to a US region. Treat the AI/LLM stack like any other high-risk supply chain. Then make it boring.
If any box is unverifiable, your “AI” is just shadow IT with GPUs.
Problem
Teams ship “Ferret-something-13B-instruct” with a README and vibes. No documented training data lineage, fine-tuning recipe, or license constraints. That is not defensible in front of an audit or in incident response.
Fix
Problem
docker pull org/runner:latest in CI is how you import tomorrow’s zero-day. If you wouldn’t ship a bank core on :latest, don’t ship inference on it either.
Fix
Problem
Runners are complex, fast-moving, and security-sensitive. Defaults can expose internal ports, shared memory, or debugging endpoints. Python backends, RDMA paths, and tensor caches become attack surfaces in a hurry.
Fix
Problem
Weights are executable data. Treat them like code. Pulling arbitrary safetensors from the internet without checks is supply-chain roulette.
Fix
Problem Â
You SBOM the app but not the model. Without a Machine Learning Bill of Materials (MLBOM) you cannot answer what changed between last week’s good and today’s bad. You lack lineage, license state, and exact artifact fingerprints for the model and its transforms.
What an MLBOM must capture:
FixÂ
Problem
CUDA, drivers, and runners form a compatibility triangle. Unplanned upgrades cause undefined behavior and open CVEs.
Fix
Problem
Telemetry sinks, inference logs, and third-party connectors quietly move prompts and outputs out of region. Compliance will call this material risk.
Fix
Problem
Bearer tokens and API keys live in YAML, env files, and Helm charts. Runners start with read-write storage tokens they do not need.
Fix
Problem
You see QPS and latency. You do not see model provenance at runtime, token source, or cross-region egress. You cannot answer “what model served this answer and with which weights.”
Fix
Problem
AI councils produce PDFs. Attackers produce shells. Map frameworks to controls and ship.
Fix
AI deployment is supply-chain security with bigger bills. Make every component verifiable, patchable, and auditable. If you cannot prove where a model came from, what it runs on, and what it talks to, you are not operating AI. You are operating luck.Â
For teams ready to move beyond luck and implement real-world, auditable controls across the LLM supply chain, AppSecEngineer offers hands-on labs, expert-led courses, and bootcamps covering model provenance, artifact signing, SBOM/MLBOM generation, and LLM-specific risk management. Accelerate the journey from theory to practice and make AI security a repeatable and measurable discipline with AppSecEngineer as a training partner.
AI/LLM supply chain security refers to safeguarding the entire lifecycle of LLMs (Large Language Models) and AI components, addressing risks found in dependencies, containers, drivers, frameworks, models, and datasets. Attackers may target any point in this chain, so organizations must ensure every artifact, whether a model file, runner, or driver, can be verified, tracked, and defended like traditional high-risk IT systems.
Provenance provides verifiable evidence of where a model, dataset, or container originated, detailing who built it, when, and with what methods or materials. This record-keeping is essential to ensure models are auditable, help with compliance, and defend against supply chain attacks that can occur when arbitrary or untrusted components are introduced.
Organizations should mandate that every critical artifact—such as model weights and containers—are both signed (using cryptographic signature tools like Cosign) and pinned to explicit digests before deployment. Verification must happen at deploy/admission time so only trusted, unaltered assets enter production.
An SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) catalogs all software components and dependencies included in a build or deployment. For AI, classic SBOMs are needed for the runtime (runners, frameworks), while extended versions like MLBOMs or AI-BOMs track model-specific items—weights, datasets, tokenizer, transforms, and more—so teams know exactly what is running and can trace changes or respond to incidents quickly.
Model weights are executable data. Unsigned or unpinned weight files can be swapped for tampered ones that might leak data, introduce backdoors, or malfunction. Always require cryptographic checksums and signatures; never load arbitrary safetensors or model files from unknown sources.
An MLBOM (Machine Learning Bill of Materials) or AI-BOM records every component—base model, weights, dataset versions, training parameters, transforms, and critical dependencies—for a model or pipeline. This granular metadata enables traceability, compliance, and rapid incident response in the event a model’s integrity or performance is questioned.
AI infrastructure depends on consistent versions across GPUs, CUDA, drivers, and runners. Drift between these can cause failures or expose vulnerabilities. Always lock compatible versions and control upgrades, ensuring critical updates are rapidly patched but changes are validated before deployment.
LLM inference should be isolated to contain security and data risks. Multi-tenant runners can leak data or experience noisy neighbor issues. Deploy models in isolated environments or VPCs, enforce authentication, and use robust network controls to avoid accidental cross-tenant exposure.
Emit runtime attestations for every request—such as model hash and runner version—allowing operational teams to link user actions to specific model states. Security metrics (like failed signature verification) should trigger alerts to catch compromise attempts as they happen.
Uncontrolled telemetry, logs, or integrations can accidentally leak sensitive prompt or output data outside regulated regions, risking compliance violations. Explicitly diagram and restrict data flows for each model, disable verbose logs, and audit third-party connectors to prevent unintentional egress.
Koushik M.
"Exceptional Hands-On Security Learning Platform"
Varunsainadh K.
"Practical Security Training with Real-World Labs"
Gaël Z.
"A new generation platform showing both attacks and remediations"
Nanak S.
"Best resource to learn for appsec and product security"