Not ready for a demo?
Join us for a live product tour - available every Thursday at 8am PT/11 am ET
Schedule a demo
No, I will lose this chance & potential revenue
x
x

Agents are going beyond scope
80% of organizations say their AI agents have already acted beyond their intended scope. In fintech, that means an agent calling payment or account APIs it was never meant to reach.
Incidents are already common
Two-thirds of organizations reported at least one AI agent-related security incident in the past year.
MCP servers are a blind spot.
In a study of nearly 8,000 live MCP servers, 40% had no authentication at all. Your agents may be connected to some of them.
Machine identities far outnumber people
Non-human identities outnumber human ones by 45:1 to over 80:1, and over 90% of organizations say their IAM tools can't manage them.
No one owns agent behavior
Fewer than 1 in 10 organizations have a named owner accountable for what their AI agents do. When an agent causes an incident, responsibility falls on the engineering leader who built it.
Existing training doesn't cover agents
Secure-coding programs cover web apps and APIs. They don't cover prompt injection, memory poisoning, tool poisoning or agent identity.





NYDFS Part 500 is fully in effect.
PCI DSS 4.0.1 bans hardcoded credentials.
SEC Regulation S-P requires notice within 30 days.
The FTC Safeguards Rule covers non-bank fintechs.
Customer security reviews now ask about agents.

Fewer security review cycles.
Agents arrive at review already hardened.
Stronger answers in customer due diligence.
You can point to certified engineers and a reference architecture.
One standard across squads.
Every team builds agents the same way, so reviews don't start from scratch.
Evidence for auditors.
You can show SOC 2, PCI and NYDFS reviewers documented, verified training.
Less dependence on AppSec.
Your engineers own agent security instead of waiting in a queue.
Security reviews agents, but engineers build them. Most review findings come from how agents were built.
Training builders reduces findings at the source. Your AppSec team spends less time on repeat issues and more time on real risk.
CSAAD gives engineering and security a shared vocabulary for agent risk, so reviews go faster.
That's who CSAAD is built for. Your engineers learn to secure agents themselves.
The capstone gives you a hardened reference agent your whole team can build from.
Compare 2 days of training with the weeks lost to failed reviews, rework and stalled customer deals.
One blocked agent launch usually costs more engineering time than the certification itself.
Standard secure-coding programs cover web apps and APIs. They don't cover prompt injection, memory poisoning, MCP supply-chain risk or non-human identity.
CSAAD fills that gap. It doesn't repeat what your team already knows.
No. Every engineer completes a graded, hands-on capstone. They have to show they can secure an agent, not just pass a quiz.
You can see which engineers have verified skills.
CSAAD teaches attack patterns and controls (identity, retrieval, tooling, secrets and runtime) that apply across frameworks.
What your team learns carries over when you switch tools.
No training makes you compliant on its own. CSAAD builds the engineering skills behind the controls that NYDFS, PCI DSS, SEC and FTC reviewers look for: least privilege, no hardcoded secrets, logging and access control.
It also gives you documented evidence of trained, verified engineers.


.png)



Koushik M.
"Exceptional Hands-On Security Learning Platform"

Varunsainadh K.
"Practical Security Training with Real-World Labs"

Gaël Z.
"A new generation platform showing both attacks and remediations"

Nanak S.
"Best resource to learn for appsec and product security"





Establish Thought Leadership
Your name, ideas, and story featured on a respected security platform. You’ll reach peers who build and secure real-world systems.
Massive Reach
We put your content in front of security engineers, developers, security champions, cloud security professionals, and more!
YouTube: 7,000+ subscribers
Platform: 4,000+ security learners
LinkedIn: 15,000+ followers (Abhay + ASE)
Get Rewarded
All accepted posts get $100 amazon gift cards!
Pick of the Month gets an extra $100 and a feature shoutout, plus a shoutout from Abhay Bhargav to 11K+ followers.
Top posts get boosted across our channels
Editorial Support
We’ll help shape your idea into a clean, valuable post. You bring the story, we’ll help make it land.
Relevant Topics
Secure coding practices that devs actually use
CI/CD security workflows that scale
Threat modeling automation + real team workflows
Developer security training that sticks
Cloud-native AppSec (AWS, K8s, Terraform, etc.)
Metrics that engineering and leadership both care about
Red teaming lessons that improved your product security
Have a topic that you think outshines this? Go for it. Every submission is absolutely free!
Our Preferred Formats
Step-by-step how-to guides
Lessons from failed (or successful) experiments
Case studies and postmortems
Opinionated takes backed by experience
Short and sharp what I learned breakdowns



Anyone working in or around AppSec, DevSecOps, cloud security, or software engineering. We welcome practitioners, devs, red teamers, tech writers, and researchers.
Not at all. We care about sharp ideas and useful content (not titles or Twitter followers). If you’ve got a real-world lesson or a process that worked (or didn’t), that’s valuable.
Anything hands-on and business-relevant in AppSec, DevSecOps, or secure engineering. This includes:
Threat modeling (real use cases)
Secure CI/CD
Cloud-native security (Kubernetes, Terraform, AWS)
Developer training that sticks
Product security workflows
Lessons from red/blue team ops
Metrics that matter to engineering leaders
No. We’re only accepting original content that hasn’t been published before, including on your personal blog, LinkedIn, or Medium.
Yes. If your post is accepted, we’ll work with you on structure, clarity, and tone while keeping your voice intact. You’ll always approve the final version before it’s published.
We recommend 800–1,200 words. If you need more space to explain something valuable, that’s also fine. We care more about usefulness than word count.
If your blog is selected and published, you’ll receive a $100 Amazon voucher as a thank-you.Each month, we also choose a Pick of the Month. They get:
An additional $100 reward
A personal shoutout from Abhay Bhargav to his 11K+ followers
Featured across our newsletter and LinkedIn channels
Yes. You can include 1–2 relevant external links (like GitHub repos, technical blog posts, or research). We don’t allow links to product landing pages, gated content, or anything SEO-driven.
Scroll up and use the submission form. Just share your name, a short pitch, and a few details. We’ll get back to you within 5–7 days.
We’ll let you know with clear and honest feedback. If it’s close, we may offer suggestions and invite a revision.